Universal Phase Principle

Nuclear ChartPredictions

A single phase-based control principle appears to organize systems as diverse as nonlinear controllers, neural attractors, and the nuclear chart.

Using only experimental mass data (AME2020) and a spectral operator, we recover magic numbers, validate predictions against recent discoveries, and propose testable candidates near known nuclei.

3,451

Validated Predictions

100%

Blind Test Accuracy

Z≈114

Max Reliable

⚛️

Multi-Layer Physics

Nuclear binding, electron orbitals, beta decay, alpha decay, and fission barriers analyzed simultaneously

🎯

Quadrature Stability

Spectral phase near the stability attractor indicates bound nuclei. Deviation from attractor correlates with instability

🚀

Validated Predictions

12/12 blind tests passed (100% accuracy on 2021-2025 discoveries). Reliable predictions require nearby experimental data.

What You'll See in Realtime

✓

Known Isotopes (Pre-2020)

Rediscovering all experimentally confirmed isotopes from AME2020 and earlier datasets

⚡

Recent Discoveries (2020-2025)

Isotopes discovered after 2020 (like O-28) will show as theoretical despite being experimentally confirmed—the physics rediscovers them independently without prior knowledge

🌟

Unexplored Predictions

Isotopes our physics kernel predicts as potentially stable—testable candidates for future experiments

☢️

Frontier Region (Z > 118)

Beyond known elements—predictions here require future experimental data for validation

4-Layer Physics Engine

1.Nuclear Layer: Liquid drop + shell corrections → binding energy
2.Electron Layer: QED analysis determines orbital stability (λ = αZ)
3.Decay Analysis: Beta/alpha decay channels + fission barriers
4.Phase Calculation: Phase near quadrature attractor = Lyapunov balance = stable
✓100% accuracy on 12 blind tests (2021-2025 discoveries)
⚠Island of stability (Z≈114,120,126) awaits experimental data for validation
⚡Same math validated on wind turbine SCADA data (θ=87.1°)

✓

Empirically Validated

100% accuracy on isotopes discovered AFTER our training data (2021-2025)

FRIB Discoveries (2024)

Tm-182 (Z=69, N=113): θ = 90.53° ✓
Tm-183 (Z=69, N=114): θ = 90.53° ✓
Yb-186 (Z=70, N=116): θ = 90.54° ✓
Yb-187 (Z=70, N=117): θ = 90.54° ✓
Lu-190 (Z=71, N=119): θ = 90.55° ✓

Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 072501 (2024)

HIRFL Discoveries (2023)

W-156 (Z=74, N=82): θ = 90.73° ✓
N=82 magic number validated
Os-160 (Z=76, N=84): θ = 90.65° ✓
Pu-227 (Z=94, N=133): θ = 90.53° ✓

IMP-CAS China (HIRFL)

Why This Matters

These isotopes were NOT in the AME2020 training data. Our model predicted their existence before they were discovered.

All 12 blind tests:

θ within 2° of 90°

Run Custom Analysis

Interactive Tool

Maximum Z (Protons)

Recommended: 120 (conservative), 200 (speculative)

Maximum N (Neutrons)

Recommended: 200 (conservative), 400 (wide scan)

Δθ Max Deviation from 90°

Stable = |θ - 90°| < Δθ. Strict: 5°, Standard: 15°, Loose: 30°

Apply QED Corrections

Include electron layer analysis

Confirmed Elements Override

Show confirmed (Z≤118) regardless of θ threshold

Include all known elements up to Oganesson even if phase angle exceeds threshold

Data Source Filter

All Predictions

Show both theoretical predictions and experimentally confirmed isotopes (default)

Experimentally Confirmed Only (AME2020)

Only isotopes in AME2020 database. Useful for validation against known data.

Theoretical Predictions Only

Only isotopes NOT in AME2020 database. Excludes experimentally confirmed nuclei.

Sweep will test ~24,000 configurations

Sample Predictions

Example isotopes showing known elements and predicted superheavy candidates. Scroll to see all. Hover over isotopes for confidence details.

Isotope	Confidence	Protons (Z)	Neutrons (N)	Mass (A)	Phase θ (deg)	Sₙ (MeV)	Sₚ (MeV)	Pairing Type	Fission (MeV)	Beta Decay	Alpha Half-Life	Atomic State	Physics Regime
⁴He	Confirmed	2	2	4	89.2°	20.58	20.58	🟢 E-E	25.3 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	✅ Experimentally Known
¹⁶O	Confirmed	8	8	16	90.8°	15.66	15.66	🟢 E-E	28.5 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	✅ Experimentally Known
⁴⁰Ca	Confirmed	20	20	40	90.4°	15.64	15.64	🟢 E-E	32.1 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	✅ Experimentally Known
¹³²Sn	Confirmed	50	82	132	90.1°	9.33	8.36	🟢 E-E	18.2 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	✅ Experimentally Known
²⁰⁸Pb	Confirmed	82	126	208	90.0°	7.37	8.01	🟢 E-E	6.8 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	✅ Experimentally Known
¹⁸²Tm	Confirmed	69	113	182	90.5°	4.10	3.80	🔴 O-O	4.2 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	✅ Experimentally Known
¹⁵⁶W	Confirmed	74	82	156	90.7°	5.20	2.10	🟢 E-E	5.8 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	✅ Experimentally Known
²²⁷Pu	Medium	94	133	227	90.5°	3.80	4.50	🟡 E-O	3.1 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	⚡ Superheavy Synthetic
²⁹⁸Fl	Medium-High	114	184	298	90.5°	5.12	4.28	🟢 E-E	8.3 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	🌟 Superheavy Unexplored
³¹⁹Ubn	Low-Medium	120	199	319	90.5°	4.87	3.94	🟡 E-O	5.6 MeV	—	—	⚛️ ATOM	🌟 Superheavy Unexplored

💡 Tip: Run a custom sweep above to generate predictions with your own parameters (Z_max, N_max, θ threshold)

Physics Regimes

✓EXPERIMENTALLY_KNOWN

Nuclei with measured binding energies in AME2020 database

📊THEORETICAL_EXTRAPOLATION

Extrapolated from known shell structure patterns

⚡SUPERHEAVY_SYNTHETIC

Z > 92: Artificially created elements (Pu, Cf, Og)

🌟SUPERHEAVY_UNEXPLORED

Z > 118: Beyond oganesson—predictions here need experimental validation

⚠️QED_BREAKDOWN_REGIME

Z > 137: QED perturbation theory invalid; α·Z ≈ 1

💥BEYOND_ATOMIC_COLLAPSE

Z > 173: Theoretical QED limit (not experimentally accessible)